Trenton Davis 7/22/19 Trenton Davis 7/22/19

Kodak Pro Image 100 Review! Now available in the USA!

Today, I review Kodak’s Kodak Pro Image 100 film! This film is now shipping from US distributors! Read more!

Kodak Pro image 100

Review and Film Scans

In 2018 it was recommended that I try a Kodak stock that I had never heard of, Kodak Pro Image 100! The only caveat was that it was available only in Europe. No big deal, however, as there were numerous eBay sellers shipping internationally. So, I had placed my first order for a new, inexpensive “Pro” stock to try out.

I had done a bit of research on this stock prior and had come across a few stunningly warm and vibrant images on Instagram. Needless to say, I was excited for what was in store.

Warner Brothers Studios backlot, LA Contax T3 Kodak Pro Image 100 — Warner Brothers Studios backlot, LA
Contax T3
Kodak Pro Image 100

THE EXPERIENCE:

Kodak Pro Image 100 is a very fine grain stock, and I was excited to try something that was a step up from the Kodak Gold lines. I don’t really haven’t found any real negatives about this film other than wishing that Kodak had released an ASA 400 version for a bit more flexibility. ASA 100 is pretty limiting once the sun drops below the horizon, but for everything else during the day it’s a wonderful replacement to Kodak Golds 100, 200, and 400 stock.

Cahuenga Blvd, Los Angeles, CA. Contax T3 Kodak Pro Image 100 — Cahuenga Blvd, Los Angeles, CA.
Contax T3
Kodak Pro Image 100

SHOOTING KODAK PRO IMAGE 100:

One of the most frequently asked questions with film stocks is how the film handles overexposure or underexposure. This is one area that Pro Image 100 is a bit sensitive. This stock doesn’t like too much overexposure nor underexposure. I’ve found that rating the film at box speed (ASA 100) will yield you the best results in terms of color and tonality balance. When overexposed, the highlights and whites seem to burn out and break at least a few stops shorter than the Portra 400 and Fuji 400H stocks. Underexposure will, of course, lift grain levels and shots are very difficult to recover during scanning. These are the ONLY negatives that I’ve experienced shooting and scanning Kodak’s Pro Image 100 stock. Otherwise, it’s a fantastic film for professional, casual, and travel work. More below…

Morrison St, North Hollywood, CA Contax T3 Kodak Pro Image 100 — Morrison St, North Hollywood, CA
Contax T3
Kodak Pro Image 100

Malibu, CA Contax T3 Kodak Pro Image 100 — Malibu, CA
Contax T3
Kodak Pro Image 100

FIRST SCANS:

WOW! I’m actually very happy with the results! Kodak Pro Image 100 looks as if it could be the love child between Kodak and Fuji. It adapted Kodak’s warmer looks but with the pastel tones of Fuji’s 400H stock! The stock has taken the best looks about both film manufacturers, and it’s final result is great to admire. Sharp detail and grain seem to play very well for an inexpensive “Pro” film stock. Be sure to expand the images to view them larger.

Cali Deserts Hexar AF Kodak Pro Image 100 — Cali Deserts
Hexar AF
Kodak Pro Image 100

CONCLUSION:

Kodak Pro Image 100 is likely to be my ongoing travel film of choice. It’s inexpensive, it’s clean, the colors are wonderful, and it’s readily available in the US from B&H Photo for $27.99 USD as of this posting. That’s a big win for us C41 shooters looking to save money but still find quality results from our negatives. So be sure to pick up a pro pack and enjoy the rest of your summer shooting this wonderful stock!

Devil’s Punchbowl, California Hexar AF Kodak Pro Image 100 — Devil’s Punchbowl, California
Hexar AF
Kodak Pro Image 100

Trenton Davis 6/15/19 Trenton Davis 6/15/19

London on Film

Some film images of various parts of London, England.

Next to NYC London was the most historically rich and fascinating city I’ve experienced. At just over 600 square miles, London has history along every street, buildings, and grounds. We experienced St. Paul’s Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, Kensington Palace, Buckingham Palace, Hampton Court Palace, Tower of London, River Thames, , Covent Garden, Winston Churchill War Rooms, an under-construction Big Ben (still spectacular though), Natural History Museum, Camden Market, Notting Hill, Kensington Gardens — it was a lot to fit in inside a weeks stay but we made it work!

St. Paul’s Cathedral

St. Pauls Cathedral has some crazy history. It has caught fire and been destroyed multiple times, lightning destroyed the spire in 1561 A.D., it fell victim to the vikings in 962 A.D., and throughout the centuries its interior and exterior have been expanded time and time again to what it is today. I recommend taking the 528 steps up to the top of the dome to see the entire city of London.

Panoramic view of London from atop St. Paul’s Cathedral Dome. Shot on the X-T20 with the Fujinon 23mm 1.4.

West Minster Abbey

The Westminster Abbey was one of my favorite places to see and learn about. There is an abundance of historically famous figures buried here such as: Charles Darwin, Isaac Newton, Charles Dickens, and many many other various figures. They didn’t allow photography inside unfortunately so I can only recommend googling more of it’s history.

Kensington Palace, home of Princes Diana and Prince Charles and Queen Victoria’s Jewels

Kensington Palace | Contax T3 + Portra 160. Scanned on Fuji Frontier SP3000.

QUEEN VICTORIA'S DIAMOND AND EMERALD DIADEM

The Kensington Palace, which resides within Hyde Park, holds a massive collection of crowns and jewels that belonged to members of the royal family such as Queen Victoria and designer Prince Albert. A number of Princess Diana’s dresses are also on display, as well.

Buckingham Palace

Below are some photos of a unique Changing of the Guards, the Horse Guard Parade.

Olympus Stylus Epic + Kodak Pro Image 100

Olympus Stylus Epic + Portra 160. Spot the small plane in the upper-right corner?

Trenton Davis 3/31/18 Trenton Davis 3/31/18

Contax T3 - Review

The perfect point and shoot camera? Maybe so... Or maybe not. It's all relative, anyway. It's an age-old argument that has been discussed for decades. As most shooters know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and that's exactly how I hope to approach shooting with different film cameras.

The perfect point and shoot camera? Maybe so... Or maybe not. It's all subjective, anyway.

It's an age-old argument that has been discussed for decades. As most shooters know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and that's exactly how I hope to approach shooting with different film cameras. I'll be the first to admit that I am a sucker for Contax bodies as there is certainly a signature look that they achieve. Most of that look lends thanks to the T* coated lens lineup. I'd like to discuss my thoughts on shooting with a Contax T3 and how I feel it compares to a close contender, the Olympus Stylus Epic.

GEAR:
Contax T3 (Black)
35mm F/2.8 Zeiss T* lens
Kodak Pro Image 100
Fuji Frontier SP3000 Scanner

GENERAL:
I picked up my T3 from a seller I found on Instagram. As with most T3s, at some point in their lifespan, this one needed a new film take-up spool to be installed. Unfortunately, they are built with a plastic spool that has a single tooth that wears down with usage and eventually renders the body useless until repaired. I had the camera sent to Nippon Photo Clinic; one week and a $250 parts-and-labor repair later, I had a perfectly functioning T3. Time to shoot!

THE EXPERIENCE:
Holding the camera feels great. It feels well-built, solid, and easy to use. It is definitely a body that I want to protect from scratches or markups of any kind so I was happy to have purchased it with a neck strap that wraps the camera in a leather half-case holder. Shooting with it is about as straight forward as you'd want a point and shoot to be. Flip the switch to "P" mode and take your shot. Simple is great for a small camera like this. Another aspect that I really appreciate about this camera is it's manual control. If I see a shot that could use certain depth of field, or a subject to be metered darker or lighter, I have that ability. Lock in the lens at F/2.8 and you've almost obtained total control over your portrait session. The one thing stopping that is its shutter speed is still counter measuring against the F-stop setting you are using. The best way to get around this is to utilize the T3's exposure compensation feature. To understand more about exposure compensation, it's very handy to learn about the F-stop range on the aperture scale, lighting ratios, and metering. This, of course, develops along with your shooting style over time.

FOCUSING:
Keep in mind that there is no easy, efficient way of seeing exactly where the T3 will be focused (more on this in a bit) so be sure to lock in on your subject or point-of-interest at the center of the frame. I'd say that around 80-90% of my quick shots were in proper focus. No focus system is perfect, especially with the older technology in most of these cameras. At a half-press of the shutter, the T3's display will show the distance that the lens is focused and ready to release. If you're skilled in US-to-metric conversions, this should be easy enough to understand – lucky you! For others, it may not make much sense to know how far 5 meters is, and by then the moment may be lost. If you're locked in place and anticipate the distance of a subject, say on a fashion runway or walkabout street-style scene, you can program the T3 lens to focus at varying focal lengths – which is handy, but a time consumer to switch back and forth when you need to. In the end, this is still just a point-and-shoot experience, so you're generally expected to shoot it as such.

VS OLYMPUS STYLUS EPIC/MJU
Prior to owning and shooting with the T3, I had been using an Olympus Stylus Epic DLX (gold and black versions) for a few years. Both cameras produced tack sharp images that compare very similarly to the T3. The major difference, for me, is the color rendition. There's always something to be said about Zeiss glass, but that's not to say the Stylus Epic renders poor color. It actually renders out fantastic color, and it works for the majority of scenes that I've shot it with. Maybe it's the placebo effect, but I feel that the T3's overall image is more consistent, smoother, and "perfect" in detail, color, and resolution. I don't have a single issue taking the Stylus Epic through dirty situations, whereas I feel that I need to treat the T3 like a nice pair of boots or luxury car. I hate to see it dirty or suffer through a dust storm – it's just too nice (and expensive) of a body to risk having it damaged. Both cameras are top choices for me but the Stylus Epic falls behind in a very close second.